Death: It Should Be Your Choice




The subject of “Death” has often sparked controversial debates of, is it right or wrong, whether humans should be deciding one’s fate or just leave a human to die of their own will. I will present three controversial topics, the death penalty, abortion, and euthanasia, which have divided our nation between if it should be allowed or not allowed. Living in a nation with freedom of speech usually sways with the major opinion and tends to cloud what is morally or ethically the right path to take on the issue of death. One would have to keep in mind our society is made up of many different cultures, which means one cultures view of wrong could be another cultures view of what is right. My claim is pro choice on the matter of death because people use free will all their lives, but when it comes to death that right is not available or seen as wrong in the eyes of society. I will demonstrate why pro-choice with issues like the death penalty where hardened criminal’s decisions to kill another which is wrong choose the death penalty as they are aware of the consequence; a woman deciding on abortion should have the choice to proceed or not with the birth of a child; and euthanasia should be available to those who cannot deal with a critical illness that does not allow for self care or machine assisted living comas. Let’s move forward and dive into why it is the choice of the criminal to except the punishment of their heinous crimes by way of the death penalty.

The criminal’s choice for the death penalty happens as soon as the death of another has taken place. The reason I say that the criminals choose the death penalty is because a human has contemplated the act that they are going to commit and are willing to accept the consequences that come along with it. Haag (1986) expressed that one may believe that everyone involved, the murderer and victim, has a right to life and not the death. I feel that the criminal that murders the victim gives up that right of life and chooses the consequence of the death penalty. Society would have us think the death penalty is wrong and needs to be abolished.

The feelings that the death penalty by the moral and ethical side of society sees it as wrong and only done because people think it is a deterrent of horrible homicidal crimes. Radelet & Akers (1996) did a survey that asked if the death penalty was a deterrent of murders how would you vote, the people were for it, and once they resurveyed and informed people that the death penalty was not a deterrent of murders, the people’s vote dropped drastically. This is why the moral and ethical side of society is insisting the death penalty be abolished from a choice of punishment for hardened criminals because most of society assumes that the death penalty helps prevent murder and other heinous crimes. This type of thinking takes away the ability to dispose of a human that has a disregard for the laws and human rights of our society. Without the choice of even considering the death penalty for the worst of worst eventually these criminals will be right back on the streets. The choice of having the death penalty available stops that from happening. I’ll give an example of another issue with the same kind of controversy abortion.

I feel women’s choice to have an abortion should not be criticized. Women through the ages have been forced to keep unwanted babies because it has been classified as a crime of murder and the facilities are not available to correctly or safely abort a pregnancy. There is physical and emotional change that affects a woman when carrying a child. I know there is life when carrying a fetus, but if that woman is not able to provide or in a position to properly care for a child why not have the option to abort the pregnancy, not to mention women that have become pregnant as a result of abuse? The woman has to live with the decision of following through with the abortion and the choice she has made was a personal one, her right not that of society. Finer & Fine (2013) find that there are about 39% of countries that still do not allow for women to have the choice to terminate a pregnancy. Well let’s explore the flip side of the issue why abortion should not be allowed.

The act of abortion is a thoughtless woman who is not considering the life opportunities of the fetus growing inside her. Marquis (1989) argues that abortion is wrong because it deprives the fetus of its future. This philosophy is believed because society feels you should give the fetus a fighting chance to be determined their future by allowing them to live. This kind of rationale needs to take in to account that the child depends on the mother for the rest of her life to provide for them. I feel the philosophy to not abort just sets up the unborn child for an unfair start in to reach their potential in life. We need to remember we are humans and mistakes are made and each case is unique and should be treated as such for example, the woman could have been a rape victim that brought about an unwanted pregnancy or a woman used protection and the protection failed. The reason for abortion is not really relevant it’s the option to have abortion available for women without recourse for their decision. Another issue dealing with death is euthanasia with massive ridicule of the act.

The act of euthanasia should be an available choice of those with critical illnesses that leave a person unable to care for one’s self and not for those in perfect health. I feel that the choice to allow a love one dignity and peace must be an available option. I know cures are found everyday, but some religions prevent people from taking them leaving them with only option of euthanasia. Duncan & Parmelee (2006) did a study that showed that times had changed the decisions towards euthanasia for most patients and cases dealing with suffering as a solution. Most people would like to die with people’s memory of them as seen in a proud and healthy state. Having illnesses like Alzheimer’s, Dementia, and Cancer can leave a person in a state where they are embarrassed of how vulnerable and weak they have become. This state of suffering should be consulted during the early stages in order to carry out ones wishes. Others feel allowing euthanasia will cause a slippery slope of unnecessary death in cases where there are possible cures or lead to others wanting to request for euthanasia.

The disapproval of euthanasia expresses that it devalues human life. Gay-Williams (1979) feels that euthanasia is wrong and that a loved one is taking advantage of a sick helpless person. I feel other people fear death and do not want the responsibility of taking the life of someone they love life, but the disease has already done that. These are good arguments, but again the choice of the person should be their own and we must respect that. I stated earlier that everyone has his or her beliefs and cultures that play a part in their decisions and we must honor those choices. It has also been argued that if we allow sick people to choose death why can’t anyone have this right. I feel this is not the case you would be committed if you wanted to just commit suicide without prior illness. This is not what euthanasia is intended for but if someone would want to do so there should be some strict guidelines allowing this to take place. The option of choice for death must be explored all the same.

The topic of death really forces you to explore your moral and ethical choices of what is best for yourself regarding issues like the death penalty, abortion and euthanasia. Society needs to remember our nation is made up of people with the freedom to choose what they think is best for themselves. We have laws like the death penalty to keep us safe from criminals that can cause harm to our way of living. Though society feels its inhumane at the end of the day our streets are little bit safer with them executed. The same with abortion, ones choice to follow through with the procedure should not be criticized by society. You do not know the process of the woman coming to the conclusion of abortion and preventing the choice just means you will be losing two lives instead of one if procedure is done incorrectly. Euthanasia should be a choice for all humans and it does not devalue life it allows a person to die with dignity. Being able to choose should not be restricted because society does not understand the reasoning, and society must respect the freedom we have to choose these options.


Duncan, O D, and L F Parmelee. “Trends In Public Approval Of Euthanasia And Suicide In The U.S., 1947-2003.”Journal Of Medical Ethics: The Journal Of The Institute Of Medical Ethics 32.5 (2006): 266-272. Philosopher’s Index. Web. 20 May 2013.

Finer, Louise, and Johanna B. Fine. “Abortion Law Around The World: Progress And Pushback.” American Journal Of Public Health 103.4 (2013): 1197-e5. SPORTDiscus with Full Text. Web. 20 May 2013.

Gay-Williams, J., “The Wrongfulness of Euthanasia,” 709-11 (edited). Copyright 1979 by                        Ronald Munson. Publish from Ronald Munson, “Intervention and Reflection: Basic Issues in Medical Ethics,” 4th Edition. Wadsworth Publishing Company: Belmont, California

Haag, Ernest van de, “The Ultimate Punishment: A Defense,” Harvard Law Review 99 (1986): 1662-69 (edited). Copyright 1886 by Havard Law Review Association.

Marquis, Don, “Why Abortion Is Immoral,” Journal of Phlosophy, vol.86, April1989, 183-202 Reprinted by permission of author and Journal of Philosophy

Radelet, Michael L., and Ronald L. Akers. “Deterrence And The Death Penalty: The Views Of The Experts.” The Journal Of Criminal Law And Criminology (1973-) 1 (1996): 1. JSTOR Arts & Sciences IV. Web. 20 May 2013.


7 thoughts on “Death: It Should Be Your Choice

  1. I love that you say each case is unique for abortion. There are so many reasons a girl might have become pregnant but not wanted to or isn’t ready. I also 100 percent agree that euthanasia should be an available choice of those with critical illnesses because if not they are suffering. Here, the quality of life needs to be assessed and decided if this person should continue on in that state of mind. The death penalty is totally the criminal’s choice. They decided to break the law not me. They need to be ready for the consequences because they chose to murder someone.

  2. How can you be so sure that the person who has been convicted of killing someone actually did it? Since nineteen seventy nine , one hundred thirty people have been set free from death row because they were found innocent after new evidence. This proves that our system is flawed and how couldn’t it be? Its run and designed by humans who are prone to mistakes. With this in mind I doubt that anyone would be so quick to judge the guilty and sentence them to death , and much less certain about the accuracy of that judgment unfortunately things are never black and white.

  3. I completely agree with all the points you made. I also did my blog post on the topic of death and these were the three issues I discussed as well. I believe that when one’s quality of life is at stake, death is a reasonable escape. Like you said, each abortion case is unique. We don’t know the circumstances the woman is going through or why she’s choosing to abort the fetus, but it honestly doesn’t matter. We have no right to deem her decision right or wrong because it is her body and she ultimately should have complete control over what is done with it. In regards to the death penalty, although there have been miscarriages of injustice in the past, many of those took place before there was DNA testing to prove one’s guilt or innocence. This is why so many people were set free from death row, because DNA testing or other technological advancements proved their innocence. Now that our technology has improved, that is not much of an issue. A person is not typically sentenced to death unless it can be proven beyond the shadow of a doubt, that he is guilty.

  4. Although I oppose euthanasia, if someone wishes to end his or her life so be it. I come from a family where everything is a collective effort. We are always there for each other. For me to sit there and allow a family member or friend to drink a deadly dose of Nembutal would devastate me. I just don’t know when should someone be allowed to make this decision. I just pray it is when he or she is of sound mind and if they are depressed or think they are no longer worthy to live among us.

  5. A fetus has a right to live because by killing them you deny them the opportunity of the future. The words you found for your article are heavy and weigh deep in my thoughts. Abortion does take away someone’s future but if you were able to peer into a looking glass and see that a particular child’s life would culminate into 3rd world living and as oppressed as ever would you urge a particular mother abort that baby. I know I would. But seeing into the future is not the answer. The answer is having control of the situation at all times. Regardless of whose future is on the line.

  6. I love the pic you used by the way I am a big anime fan too. But to get on topic death is and should be a right given to the individual. It is among the only things that we should have control over. Living with a sickness and having to deal with the pain day in and day out is a curtly really. Staying alive and around for others sake and their own weaknesses is not something that we should put on others. Each person should have the right to fight for the way they should end their time here, and should not be stopped by doctors or relatives. Give them that justice at least to go when they feel it is their times so that they have no regrets. Save them by letting them go.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s